Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
Technically, any asset that provides you an economic benefit in more than one year needs to be depreciated. Also, you may not take 179 if it gives you an operating loss unless you carry forward the excess 179 deduction against future 179 deductions. YOu don't want to do that.

Realisticly, you should look at the materiality of what you want to expense. Say you have an operating loss. You have purchased equipment during the year of 1,000. If you expensed that, would it have a material effect on your income statement? Does your office expense have 10,000 in it or 1,000? What about your other expenses? Would an extra thousand stick out? What about an extra two thousand? For the clients at the firm I work at, we generally expense (expense, not 179) items 2K and under if it will not materialy affect the income statement. In addition, we will take 179 if we can.
Print the post  

Announcements

Disclaimer:
In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.