Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
Thanks very much, Peter.

Stocks and mutual funds play by different rules when determining cost basis. So you need to make sure which one you're dealing with.

Assuming your second comment is correct and this is a stock

Yup, and my mind was going faster than my fingers with my first post <g>.

And no, using a zero cost does not lock you in to using a zero cost for the rest of the shares.

That's what I thought, and I'm glad you've confirmed it.

The dollar amounts I've got are $6.48, $.05, $0.59, $12.71, $5.69, $1.57, $15.54, $5.23 and two for $0.01 -- totalling under $50, which doesn't seem to be worth the effort of digging through all the documentation (let alone looking for the documentation, packrat that I am) for those fractional shares.

There are a couple of others of higher dollar amounts which warrant some effort, but not those other ones I've listed.

Thanks again!

~~ Alison
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.