Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 2
The department has always been sluggish in issuing these standards. But under Mr. Bush it has been more passive than ever, failing to issue a single strengthened efficiency standard since he took office.

jp:

As usual, another great post.

I can remember in the early years of clean air standards, the question was, "Should standards exceed current manufacturing capability?" The answer should have been: "If the technology is there, then yes!"

One reason AMSC isn't a $50 stock (or even higher) is that it will have to develop the markets for its products. Instead of the government's standard for a gigantic motor being so high in 2010 that a 2G superconducting wire model would be required, we continue building more electric generating facilities, and burning more fossil fuels, instead of getting rid of energy hungry motors that can be sucking up energy for 30 years or more. It puts AMSC on the long hard road of fighting to get new technology implemented instead of being help to solve a pressing energy (and clean air) problem in this country.

Sorry for the soap box speech but the politic rhetoric on energy really gets under my skin...

W.D.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.