Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 6
The fact is that the businesses is doing terrific but WEB is lowballing this.
There is too much over engineering of PBV, 4 column, 5 Groves etc.

In the four groves I used a multiple of 14. The market is assigning much higher multiples to similar businesses, e.g. CSX is 19, Vanguard Utilities ETF is about 25. If I plug in, say 20, in my 4 groves, "intrinsic value" is now approximately $440K A ($293 B), 1.7x book. That's probably closer what exuberant Mr. Market should be offering for Berkshire in comparison with alternatives, but Berkshire don't get no respect no more.

If the last know buyback was a 95 cent dollar, that's a multiple of 11.5, or perhaps more likely, a bit higher multiple with a haircut on investments like Jim does (12.5 and a 10% haircut gets you there).

WEB, of course, isn't interested in Berkshire's stock price going to exuberant levels - even though it would benefit the charities he supports. I think that at least while he's around, an owner of Berkshire will get a return close to how the business performs. Multiple expansion simply isn't on the cards.
Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.