Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
The far simpler theory has nothing to do with God. You should consider the possibility that those who reject ID do so because the arguments you present, as well as those presented by Behe and Dembski, are flawed.

I dont' think that's the answer either, though a logical possibility.

The cases for ID and evolution both depend critically on inference: in the case of ID, it is the inference of design from an arrangement of parts that outside biology demand a design inference. For evolution, the inference is in the accumulation of small changes (which can be observed) into big changes.

Why does one seem to be the more rational inference to some, while others go with another choice?

Your implication that supporters of evolution are the only ones using evidence and reason to develop a worldview, while ID supporters fudge the facts to provide a placebo for their faith would be highly insulting to some people.

If in fact that's what you're implying.


Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.