Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
The genetic code looks designed. It may well be.

And the evidence for that is where, again?

It has a level of complexity AND specification that is only known to originate in an intelligent source. The ability to replicate is not the same thing as originating information.


That's not evidence (data). That's a logical argument. And, it's a logical argument that's both at least a hundred years old and fundamentally flawed. See: Nature, No. 2010, Vol. 78, May 7, 1908:

... are visible to us as the Marian canals. Lowell adduces the straightness of the canals as a proof that they are the artificial products of intelligent beings.

So, again, I'll ask: And the evidence for that is where, again?

DNA exhibits features that are only known to originate with intelligent sources. The canals on Mars can be explained by natural processes like erosion. You are confusing a figurative use of "looks like" in one case with an literal use of a "looks like" argument in another.

Despite your claim that I made a logical argument with no data, the complexity of DNA combined with its specification IS the data, and is strong evidence of its design. We need a scientific explanation of the data. Do you have one?
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.