We're pleased to announce an update is coming to the community boards.
Sunday, September 25th: We are migrating the boards to a new platform. The site is currently in read-only mode and we will bring it back online as soon as the migration is complete.
The guy is a genius. Probably the best I've ever seen anywhere in political discussion....Karl Rove is almost as good, but not quite. He is awesome, because he's the 'anti-Krugman', inasmuch as he's an actual intellectual, whereas Krugman just tries to play the part.I Tivo Special Report just so I can watch the 10 minutes of Krauthammer. I call him 'the Hammer', as in 'Bring the Hammer!' and 'Hammer Time!' My 11-year-old son is in on this as well. I think it's good to show him a guy like Krauthammer, who is always calm and incisive. (I'm sure that there are children of liberals out there who are being encouraged to grow up to be like David Axelrod or Debbie Wasserman Schulz, and that is truly sad.)Krauthammer's commentary on O'Reilly last night was spot-on (as usual). O'Reilly was wailing about why Romney didn't bash Obama on Benghazi, and Krauthammer correctly stated that it's Romney's job to get elected, not to score points. O'Reilly wanted a slugfest, but if Romney were to go that route and Obama lied like he did before, and if Schieffer came to his aid like Crowley (the whole 'get the transcript' thing practically screams collusion, with which, of course, the MSM is fine), he wouldn't gain anything, and might lose some independents. Romney, true to form, set a good strategy and executed it. Obama has had four years of poor strategy, executed poorly. The choice couldn't be more clear.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |