Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 20
The level of the 10 year Treasury is the single biggest factor here. Per Buffett's instruction on valuing common stocks. Its why Buffett is very heavily positioned in business ownership here: pieces of businesses and entire businesses. And, for him, is historically underweight fixed income.

The 10 year Treasury was 6 TIMES higher in 2000. And higher most of the past century.

Why is this factor either ignored or brushed aside? I don't get it.

Income from blue chip dividend payers has arguably never been more valuable nor reasonably priced.

A 3% dividend payer in a 1% world is golden. A 3% dividend payer in a 6% world is not that attractive. Same stock...identical balance sheet and income statement. 2000 versus today. Night and day different.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.