Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1
The original statement was...

<<Also, you may not take 179 if it gives you an operating loss unless you carry forward the excess 179 deduction against future 179 deductions. YOu don't want to do that.>>

And RooCat sez...

<<And why not? I have used it for the better of the client when we knew the following year was going to be much higher income.>>

And I agree. If you have a pretty good feeling going forward that the max 179 limits will not be reached in the following year, and the following year will produce enought profit to be able to use the carryover 179 expense from the prior year, it's a good way to go. Something that you should at least consider.

It sure beats taking 3, 5, or 7 (or more) depreciation in the year of the loss and then having to wait all those years to get the full benefit of the depreciation deduction.

TMF Taxes
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.