Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
The point of my message was that there are now three companies who could legitimately call themselves full-service oil field service companies: Schlumberger, Halliburton, and Baker. Baker may indeed be a takeover target, but the only companies that would or could buy it are Halliburton and Schlumberger. Baker has a market cap of nearly 5 billion and Halliburton and Schlumberger are nearly 2 to 3 times that big with Halliburton's acquisition of Dresser.

If either Schlumberger or Halliburton tried to buy Baker some anti-trust sentiment would surely emerge. Therefore I think long-term Baker is not a good investment. If you want to try to make a buck on merger rumor in the short-term, you may do well, but long-term BHI will probably get smaller and cheaper.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.