Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 4
The "Study" never said anything other than this.

The "study" is a bunch of numbers, and there is nothing wrong with the numbers.

The problem is what intercst says on this board about the study. intercst says on this board that the study tells you the safe withdrawal rate. It does not. He used a methodology that does not permit a statistially valid assessment of the safe withdrawal rate. He cannot possibly know what the safe withdrawal rate is by looking at the numbers that appear in his study.

More serious-minded researchers have taken a look at some of the factors that intercst failed to look at and have come up with assessments of the safe withdrawal rate far off from the one intercst frequently refers to on this board. The proper thing to do if he is going to refer to the numbers in his study is to note when doing so that the study was prepared using a methodology that produces results lacking statistical validity.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.