Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 2
There is a very strong consensus among New Testament scholars that Paul could not have written 2 Timothy.

Phillip Towner, NT scholar, wrote a commentary on Paul's letters. While he acknowledges your claim that the majority view of NT scholarship is that Paul didn't write them, it all comes down to assumptions:

"As I view the scholarly situation, there are gains and losses. While the majority view’s more recent conclusion that the [letters] present a coherent theology and a real setting in history might be an improvement over the older view that regarded the letters as simply a haphazard collection of traditions and Pauline memorabilia (as well as rather lame forgeries), it has evolved into a monolithic, rigid interpretive framework that rests on assumptions and creative reconstructions. These assumptions shape the interpretive methodology of the consensus; and this determines and in some ways restricts the understanding of the theology of these letters that results. What needs to be shown here is that the key assumptions and the methodology are neither airtight nor particularly compelling when objectively considered." --Towner, P. H. (2006). The Letters to Timothy and Titus (p. 20). Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

He then proceeds to dismantle the majority view in subsequent discussion. I highly recommend it.

Speaking of consensus, have you ever read Gary Habermas' "minimal facts" argument for the historicity of the Resurrection? These 6 or so "facts" are accepted by a wide majority of NT scholars:

1) that Jesus died by crucifixion; 2) that very soon afterwards, his followers had real experiences that they thought were actual appearances of the risen Jesus; 3) that their lives were transformed as a result, even to the point of being willing to die specifically for their faith in the resurrection message; 4) that these things were taught very early, soon after the crucifixion; 5) that James, Jesus’ unbelieving brother, became a Christian due to his own experience that he thought was the resurrected Christ; and 6) that the Christian persecutor Paul (formerly Saul of Tarsus) also became a believer after a similar experience. (https://ses.edu/minimal-facts-on-the-resurrection-that-even-...)

-Bryan
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.