Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 1
There was a pre-existing (the word comes to mind with health insurance) rule, from 1995, about Medicare premiums as not qualifying since it was a govt. program, and therefore couldn't be "established in the name of the business". OK, that seemed logical.

But that meant, therefore, that a self-employed business owner, over 65 years of age, whose most likely option was to get Medicare plus a supplement policy, could deduct the supplement policy premiums but not the Medicare premiums. And they have now moved to eliminate that inconsistency.


OK, that makes sense when the sole prop has been buying the insurance. What's your take in OP's situation, where the insurance has been subsidized through the spouse's job?

Phil
Rule Your Retirement Home Fool
Print the post  

Announcements

Disclaimer:
In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.