Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
This is probably not the appropriate forum for debating the merits of securities litigation, but since the issue has come up...

In the first place, does anybody really think that correspondence from unhappy shareholders has any impact whatsoever on management. If, as the former employees claim, the company operates as a patriarchy with "daddy" knowing all of the answers, why would "daddy" care about investors who have lost money.

As for the assertion, "The only people who would profit from a suit against EAI right now are the lawyers. Some companies choose to settle out of court just to avoid the expense and embarassment of defending a lawsuit. The lawyers walk away with a third of that pie and leave each of the shareholders with a few crumbs... far from the amounts they lost. That's why so many lawfirms specialize in these kinds of suits -- they are quite lucrative... for the lawyers." That is not quite accurate. First of all, class action fees are controlled by the court, I have yet to be involved in a case where counsel got "a third of the pie." Second, the real money in the securities business doesn't go to the litigators. It goes to the underwriters and their counsel who get huge fees tied to the size of the deal. Think about the fees being paid in the Sprint/MCI merger.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.