No. of Recommendations: 0
Those property taxes are amazingly cheap indeed. Mine will be over $10,500 for my 4700 sq ft home in California purchased last year.

We paid $12,000 in a Chicago suburb 15 years ago. Of course they picked up the garbage twice a week, so it was worth it.

It would be 4.375%. Marginal tax rate about 35% combined, so really only 2.84% guaranteed after-tax return since I would be itemizing regardless of having a mortgage.

OK. It's still twice what you can get in a savings account, which is what the OP advised I should do.

Property values do fluctuate widely though, as we know, so putting a lot of cash into equity is not always a smart thing.

It depends what you mean by "a lot of cash." First, we didn't put "a lot of cash" into it. The property value grew, over time, because we selected well. (Back Bay Boston, riverview. They're not making any more of that.) Second, it's still a small fraction of our net worth, and it provides a diversity of revenue stream - as well as a significant payout. Condo fees: $400/mo. That leaves $600/mo for taxes and maintenance, which is more than sufficient. That that leaves 1800/mo profit. I really don't know where I'm going to put $400,000 (the net after sales commissions, fees, and taxes) and get $24,000 a year, virtually guaranteed, with the prospect of asset appreciation to boot. It's difficult for me to envision a scenario in which this investment goes to zero, unlike any stock or bond you could name.

PS. I don't advocate putting "a lot of cash" into rental property. I do advocate examining the thesis that renting is cheaper than owning. That is absurd on its face, or there would be no landlords, anywhere.

And the return in those accounts is likely to be above 2.84%.

Entirely possible. Indeed, historically over long stretches of time incontestable. But there are also fairly long periods where the market goes backwards or remains flat, and you have no progress at all. The market is trading about where it was a decade ago, for instance. And we all know the old saw about how long it took the market to get back to even after 1929, right? (Something like 25 years, I believe.)

As I am recently retired (well, I retired a while ago; Mrs. Goofy stopped work last year), we can ill afford a long stretch where equities don't produce income.

Also, in the case of California, the home can be in a big earthquake which is a risk we can't afford to insure, and most Californians can't either.

My cheery advice: don't build in California. ;)
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.