Skip to main content
Non-financial boards have been closed.

Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon. | The Motley Fool Community
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 21
From what I'm seeing in the news, it looks like the Jan 6 committee is a bit split over whether to issue subpoenas to 3 of their colleagues who have refused to voluntarily testify to the committee.

Those who would prefer not to issue the subpoenas are concerned that the likely legal fight would delay the issuance of their report. But I don't see why that has to be. If the fight does drag out too long, they can issue their report without the testimony from these men. If they don't issue subpoenas, they WILL issue their report without that testimony. The report will be the same either way.

But I think it's worth issuing the subpoenas to establish precedent and answer the question - can a sitting member of Congress be compelled to testify before a Congressional committee? This is a rare opportunity to get that question answered - either via decisions in the courts or by these men complying with the subpoena.

Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.