No. of Recommendations: 0
TMFPixy wrote:
<<Hence, I don't think my use of marginal rates in this computation is either "bogus" or inappropriate. But I do think your use of effective rates is. <g> >>

That pretty much sums up my whole post, doesn't it?

It looks like the way I was trying to use effective rates for rebate calculations is all wrong, it turns out the different between my "effective rebate" and the real $560 rebate is always accounted for in the *change* in effective rate (deducting versus not deducting). Since I was using the same idea in that entire post I expect anyplace that involved a rebate is completely wrong.

<<You are obviously an advocate of effective tax rates>>

Actually I've not an offical advocate... haven't received my membership badge yet =). I hopped on that idea about a week ago... from you reply I see that it doesn't work some in places I've been using it, I need to think about it more.

The last few charts that didn't involve rebates (that used effective rates) might still be useful...

I'll still try to figure out a "roth-ify" formula based on time, tax rates and return rates... one must exist.


there is something that still might be worth asking:

given a taxable investment earning 9%, 30% is dividend income (taxed at 28% marginal rate), 70% is long term capital growth (20%).

I wrote:
<<I think the 8.244% return per year on the after tax account is bogus... here's my math:

return = (rate * 70%) ... taxed at capital gains rate + (rate * 30%) ... taxed at effect tax rate >>

TMFPixy replied,
<<I'm sure it makes sense to you to use effective tax rates here, but it doesn't to me. Again, the example has John in the 28% marginal rate. If the $560 per year earned a taxable dividend during the year, because of his marginal rate John would pay $0.28 on each dollar earned.>>

okay I agree, 28% on the dividends (not 22.6) and 20% on the capital gains. wouldn't that mean a still lower the after tax yield on a 9% investment:

return = (yield * 70%) ... taxed at capital gains rate + (yield * 30%) ... taxed at marginal rate.

so something like:
6.984 = (9 * .7 * .8) + (9 * .3 * .72)

after all if you are earning 9% and you get taxed at 20% on the whole investment you keep 80% of the "growth"... 9 * .8 == 7.2. How can someone who is being taxed at 20% and 28% expect a higher 8.244% return?

(8.244 / 9 = 91.6%, meaning the gov't only gets 8.4% of the yearly yield??? ... i must be missing something.)

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.