Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
TMFTwitty wrote:
"Since TransAct was first authorized in March to begin repurchasing its shares, it bought back 122,000 shares in Q2 and, as revealed yesterday, 409,000 in total. The 287,000-share difference between those numbers will therefore be subtracted from the number of shares among which TransAct's ultimate Q3 profits will be divided.
... Next quarter, however, shareholders should remember that the reduced share count will inflate profits per share somewhat compared with the second quarter."
When stocks split, historical prices and price-charts get adjusted. But when stock buybacks occur, no adjustments are made? It seems to me that if third quarter profits-per-share are going to be "inflated", then that is a distortionary event that ought to be remedied just like historical pricing is when a split occurs. The investing public needs to be served up apples-to-apples comparitive data. What would be wrong with adjusting historical EPS when stock buybacks occur??? In terms of a mandatory reporting practice.
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.