Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.
To continue that thought, Richard Dawkins is a scientist, an atheist, and a vocal opponent of religion.Is it fair then to reject evolution, no matter the evidence, as an atheistic assault on religious belief (its "real" agenda) ? No? Then neither is it fair to reject ID because Demski and Behe are Christians, have a "strategy", or the theory has religious implications.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |