Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 1
I haven't seen anyone here talking about the VoIP portion of the Paul Johnson interview on this board yet. Anyway, I posted this on the Clarent board (since
PJ already said it was a Gorilla Game, I'll take his word about it, and just try to see if the tornado has begun yet).

I only used their revenue numbers, as they have just completed acquisition of ACT Tech. and during the tornado, a company should only be conscerned with grabbing market share, not so much with earnings:


I admit I'd never heard of this company before reading 
this interview with Paul Johnson, co-author of "The Gorilla Game":

      http://www.internetstocks.com/Mindshare/mindshare_johnson.html

Snippets:

Internetstocks.com: Let's break down the topography. What are the most important subsectors of the buildout? 

Johnson:We split the industry into three parts. The next generation of core Internet protocol-based services is one. We have to deliver dialtone for phone
service and IP-based tone in an Internet world. The products here are very software-intensive. We believe that this is a Gorilla Game: high software-intensity, therefore scale economies and high switching costs that are likely to drive value to the first mover.

The second segment is sometimes referred to as voice over IP, or Internet telephony. We haven't had many
new services in the voice world for a long time, and this will leverage the network we have described and all its innovation. Easy provisioning of additional
lines, greater flexibility in directing calls, etc.
This is also a very software-intensive business, with high switching costs and barriers to entry. 

      And:

In Next Generation services, looking at voice over IP, we believe the Gorilla candidates are Clarent (CLRN $36-9/16), Sonus Networks (SONS $202-1/8) and 
MCK Communications (MCKC $25). These are a little younger than the IP companies. In our view, none of
the companies has emerged as the Gorilla, so we are in the own-the-three camp.

So I've started to dive into the numbers, here's a quick look at the last 8 quarters, in terms of revenue,
earnings (per share), sequential and year-over-year revenue growth for CLRN:

                  seq.        Y/Y
Quarter revenue  growth      growth      EPS
-------   ----    ----        ----      ------
Q2-2000   28.3     15%        304%      $0.01
Q1-2000   24.6     32%        367%      $(0.02)
Q4-1999   18.7     42%        317%      $(0.13)
Q3-1999   13.2     42%        400%      $(0.17)
Q2-1999    9.3     39%                  $(0.61)
Q1-1999    6.7     14%                  $(0.69)
Q4-1998    5.9     78%                  $(0.48) 
Q3-1998    3.3

I haven't started looking at SONS or MCKC, but SONS was a recent IPO and sport a Market Cap about 8x that of CLRN! And I was wondering why he didn't mention NTOP?

Tim

PS: feel free to ad or comment!!

Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 3
Tim,

Yes, that appears to be the game in the VoIP arena:

Clarent
Sonus Networks
MCK Communications

"In Next Generation services, looking at voice over IP, we believe the Gorilla candidates are Clarent (CLRN $36-9/16), Sonus Networks (SONS $202-1/8) and MCK Communications (MCKC $25). These are a little younger than the IP companies. In our view, none of the companies has emerged as the Gorilla, so we are in the own-the-three camp."

What Paul is saying is that the point of the technology adoption cycle is in the earlier stages than IP and the 'own-the-three camp' is the classic 'basket' strategy where it is too early to be considering consolidation until more time is played out in the 'game'. It's not a game I have been following that closely in the past, but certainly might be worth some research and tracking if you are interested in following the game and seeing how the early game unfolds. No need to jump in with real money this instant, but take the time to track it for a good length of time to see what's what.

As has been said on this board before, there are many, many games going on in technology . Some that have more mass market appeal than others. Plenty of things in technology to cover, follow and track.

BB
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Tim,  you were a little too ambitious with the Y/Y growth rates.  Simple math error likely.

Clarent Corporation: Sales ($Mil) and EPS

                  seq.        Y/Y
 Quarter revenue  growth      growth      EPS
 -------   ----    ----        ----      ------
 Q2-2000   28.3     15%        204%      $0.01
 Q1-2000   24.6     32%        266%      $(0.02)
 Q4-1999   18.6     42%        215%      $(0.13)
 Q3-1999   13.2     42%        305%      $(0.17)
 Q2-1999    9.3     39%                  $(0.61)
 Q1-1999    6.7     14%                  $(0.69)
 Q4-1998    5.9     78%                  $(0.48) 

 

Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Rob,
if you compare Q2-2000 to Q2-1999, you see that it is
28.3/9.3 or 304% (28.3 is 304% of 9.3), and so on.

Tim (still ambitious)
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Oops, Rob you were quite right, by my math, if a company
had revenue of 100 million to quarters in a row, that would qualify as 100% growth! That IS a little generous.

I've taken myself out and had myself flogged.

Thanks, Tim
Print the post Back To Top