Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 12
We could ...


All of which play nicely into a long term strategy, and I can't disagree with any of them (save for the Florida shot).

But how will any of these stop a terrorist from blowing up an oil tanker or releasing anthrax in, say, the next 6-12 months?

Your ideas work in the long run, but can't say I see them working in the short run. There are too many groups with too much capability right now. Personally, I think we need to knock out the immediate threat before a long term defense strategy can work.

And, for the record, in case someone hasn't read my other posts on the topic, I am against wholesale bombing of civilian targets and against storming in with massive amounts of troops. Not only do I disagree with the concept, but I also don't think it will be effective. Best solution (out of several imperfect options) that I see is increased intelligence supplemented with heavy use of special ops teams. Target the terrorists, leave the civilians out of it, and disable terrorist capability. Not pretty, but I think it has the highest chance of success.

--Pup
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.