Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 0
Well, I have to say I think insurance is a bad idea for everybody except couples with small children. So let me leave that alone.

Let me compare your pension with 100% survivorship to your pension with 50% survivorship. Let's simplify and say the 100% survivorship option gives you 0.9 of the full benefit.

If you live N years and get x dollars per year while alive, then M years after your death under the 50% survivorship option the total collected is Nx + Mx/2. With the other option it's 0.9(M + N)x. These become equal when 0.1N = 0.4M, or M = N/4.

To finish the calculation you have to decide when each of you and your wife are going to die. If you are each now 62, you will live to 79.5 with 50% probability and your wife to 83. This argues slightly in favor of the 100% survivorship option. However, I've neglected investment and so on. Personally, if I were married, I'd take the larger sum up front.
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.