Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 5
What the anti-ID group is questioning is whether the pro-ID group...

If I may pick a nit here...

I clearly an NOT in the "pro-ID group", but I take issue with being called "anti-ID". I'm not. I'm anti-pseudoscience. If ID can present a coherent hypothesis that explains all the data, and further can make testable (and subsequently verified) predictions, then I will accept it as worthy of consideration as science.

However, to-date all they have is an appeal to incredulity ("How can the flagellum NOT have been the result of design?!") and appeal to authority ("It says so right here in the Bible"). Neither of those things cut it with me (or any other scientist).

Evolution has met the aforementioned criteria, and so is a part of science.

QED.

1poorguy
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.