Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.
which are irrelevant to the discussion. If it has a natural explanation, it doesn't require an appeal to intelligence.Nice attempt at side-stepping my comments.You claim that DNA "looks designed" to you.I claim that these natural formations possess many attributes that YOU would attribute to "looking designed".Things that "look designed" upon a cursory inspection may in fact have natural explanations when examined in detail. My contention is that you certainly don't and scientists may not possess enough information to provide a completely naturalistic explanation, but that's no reason to invoke god and declare that no further investigation needs to be made.Let me reiterate my position on this:Saying that God designed DNA is a perfectly OK statement to make from a religious perspective.However, it is NOT OK to make as a scientific explanation. Science looks for the mechanics or rules that Nature/God uses to make things. These rules are consistent meaning we have no evidence that the mechanics of the Universe change. Therefore, Science doesn't care whether a distant God utilized the properties of the Universe to design and build all living things or not. Science just wants to know what those rules are.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |