Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
Who thinks the majority of brokerages will start charging a lot for back records, if they have them

This is where Peter the Packrat gets to chime in again.


My broker only charges a nuisance fee for older records, albeit the fee is large enough to be a nuisance.

Beyond that, what Peter said. Hitting up the broker for past records really ought to be just a one or two time occurrence to fill in a gap or to recover from a record keeping mistake. Hitting up the broker for past records ought not be routine matter.

Eric Hines
Print the post  

Announcements

Disclaimer:
In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.