Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 11
I just dont understand it. XM recieves bad news that it is going to court, SIRI drops. XM recieves good news that it renewed two contracts, SIRI drops.

Did anyone take into account that NEITHER of these two peices of news negatively affects SIRI in any way shape or form? Yet the stock has dropped nearly 13% in the past three weeks.

The XM lawsuit does not affect SIRI in any way, because regardless of the outcome, SIRI already has an agreement with the music companies for the portable recording of music. Not only that, these agreements have already been priced into SIRI quarterly income figures. XM on the other hand, if they loose the lawsuit, will have to pay a settlement PLUS obtain an agreement for a price with the music companies, which Im sure will be higher than SIRI's, all of which has not been priced into anything. So why does this hurt SIRI?

XM recieves the good news that two of its contracts have been extended for factory installations. They were companies that XM already had agreements with, they were contracts that were not set to expire until 2010 anyway, and one of the companies still has SIRI installed in an aftermarket deal with SIRI which does not change. I can see where it would be disappointing for SIRI stockholders, but it should not come as that big of a surprise, especially considering Honda has nearly a 7% stake in XMSR with over 20 million shares. It should also be no surprise when GM renews it's contract, for the same reason.

So what is it that makes people hate SIRI? Is it the fact that so many people lost a lot of money on the stock? Is it the fact that analysts had their nose rubbed in the dirt by their customers because of the huge drop in stock price?

There are so many compelling reasons to own Sirius Satellite Radio.
1) SIRI's subscriber growth is much better than XMs.
2) SIRI and XM reported positive cash flow in the same quarter;
even through SIRI is behind on the "business line" being 2
years "younger".
3) SIRI managment is well known in the mergers and aquisitions dept.
4) While still heavily in debt, it is begining to take steps at cost
control. While still behind XM, it is also 2 years behind on the
business line and will catch up quickly.
5) XM is owned by institutions. Institutions hold nearly 90% of the
company. SIRI on the other hand, is only 28% owned by institutions.
The biggest reason for this is many institutions have a rule that
states they cannot own a company that has a stock price under $5.
When/If SIRI hits the $5 mark and maintains that, you will see many
more institutions buying in, which will drive the stock up further.
6) In a curious sign of loyalty, SIRI's short sellers abandoned ship
last month. December showed 141.09 million short shares, but January
saw that number drop to 118.87 million. This 22 million drop
represents 15.75% drop in shorts. Compare that to XMSR who went from
December number of 33.11 million to January number of 33.98 million,
a nearly 3% GAIN of shorts.
7) In the flurry of recent upgrades and downgrades of SIRI and XMSR,
more than one analyst has already PUBLICLY stated that SIRI will
surpass XMSR by 2009 in total subscribers, making SIRI that "best
of breed" in the industry, something that most of us knew already.
8) Speaking strictly as a customer, SIRI broadcasting is far superior
to that of XM. In the places where customers have a CHOICE of which
SatRad to go with (i.e. Retail) people choose SIRI over 60% of the
time. This customer loyalty and brand recognition will be the key
driver to SIRI's success.
9) Howard Stern, as much as I personally detest him, has done wanders
for SIRI. I think it was the best move they could have made, and I
dont think the price tag was too high for what he was able to do.
10) Hugh Panero sucks. Mel Karmazin rules. Mel is a real go-getter and
someone that makes things happen. I just dont see that from Panero.
I see Mel taking over when/if the SIRI/XMSR merger happens, with
Hugh being pacified with a board seat and an executive title and a
nice buyout.
11) Hugh Panero has a total of 155k shares in XMSR, ALL of which were
GIVEN TO HIM. The only stock purchased by him was via stock options,
which he turned around and sold the entire lot the same day (not
paperless trade). Mel on the otherhand, over the last two years has
never recieved free stock from SIRI. He has PURCHASED 2 million
shares for a combined cost of almsot 11 million dollars out of his
pocket. Mel owns a total of 6.5 million shares. Who has confidence in
their company?

Ok, enough of a rant. I've said my peice. I will also be posting this in the XMSR forum, as well as my personal blog. Feel free to come comment, good or bad. I want to see the other side of the argument.
Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.