Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 3
Why does one seem to be the more rational inference to some, while others go with another choice?

Because some believe that the evolution inference is supported by far more empirical data than the ID. And with respect to science, some believe that the evolution inference provides the clearest and most informative set of predictions that can be tested and used to generate more information and a better theory, while ID makes no prediction other than evolution is false.

Your implication that supporters of evolution are the only ones using evidence and reason to develop a worldview, while ID supporters fudge the facts to provide a placebo for their faith would be highly insulting to some people.

Don't mean to be insulting, just pointing out what seems to me fairly obvious. Those who believe they know the history of creation by Divine revelation will tend to accept information consistent with that truth and challenge information that is not. In contrast, those whose world view is largely determined empirically will tend to use new information to modify what they think is the truth.

I think history is on my side on this issue.
Print the post  

Announcements

When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.