No. of Recommendations: 5
Enjoy reading about your lying president:-)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/bob-woodward-obamas-s...
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Enjoy reading about your lying president:-)

Oh My Gawd! Impeach the bastard! How dare he deny originating the ONLY recent bi-partisan agreement to significantly cut spending!
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
"Oh My Gawd! Impeach the bastard! How dare he deny originating the ONLY recent bi-partisan agreement to significantly cut spending! "

Got it! You are A-OK with your president LYING. Good to know for future posts.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 7
Got it! You are A-OK with your president LYING. Good to know for future posts.

I'm not "A-OK" with anyone lying. However I do accept the reality that sometimes people lie, or sometimes they're misunderstood but are still characterized as lying, or sometimes they misspeak but are still characterized as lying, etc. Take, for example, your purposeful mis-characterization of my post as my being A-OK with your president LYING.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
"
I'm not "A-OK" with anyone lying. However I do accept the reality that sometimes people lie"

I am too. Except Obama as shown himself to be a serial liar. Glad to know you are OK with it.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
<bI'm not "A-OK" with anyone lying. However I do accept the reality that sometimes people lie, or sometimes they're misunderstood but are still characterized as lying, or sometimes they misspeak but are still characterized as lying, etc. Take, for example, your purposeful mis-characterization of my post as my being A-OK with your president LYING.</b

Riddle- When is a liar not a liar?




Ans- When it is Obama!


LMAO at such rationalizing hypocrites

99
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
the ONLY recent bi-partisan agreement to significantly cut spending
I'm sorry. Perhaps I have misunderstood. Has actual spending been cut?
I had understood that only budgets were cut meaning spending would still increase but at a lower rate.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Please, don't confuse the libs with facts.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
99 -- I don't get it.

If you're not an American, why do you care?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Woodward is an attention whore, well past his prime.

Ken
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
"Woodward is an attention whore, well past his prime.

Ken "

Yeah, how dare he expose the truth about Obama!
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
<bIf you're not an American, why do you care?

I am one of the "hosts" of America. I am one of the 53% who pay taxes and now pay MORE taxes.

The rest of American feds off me.

Maybe I am just tired of being a host for parasites at governments chosing. They take from us and give to themselves and others all the while obtaining a larger voting base in return.

Apathy or just "America" lost.

99
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
DGS - the ONLY recent bi-partisan agreement to significantly cut spending

WL - I'm sorry. Perhaps I have misunderstood. Has actual spending been cut?
I had understood that only budgets were cut meaning spending would still increase but at a lower rate.


Good question - a question I do not have time to research right now. But, I can give two quick responses;

1. If you look at Obama's submitted budget projections, take $85 billion from either 2013 or 2014 Outlays and compare that number to the previous year's projected Outlay. It looks like a spending cut.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2...

2. The media frequently refer to "spending cuts", so if that's not the case, it's carelessness on my part. But, as The Wall Street Journal notes;

How Federal Spending Would Be Cut Under the Sequester

1) Defense spending, which includes Pentagon and defense intelligence spending, accounts for half the sequester cuts. Many of these programs will be reduced by roughly 13% over seven months.

2) Non-defense spending. This would include housing, education, or transportation programs.

3) Medicare. There will be a 2% cut in the payments to Medicare providers, such as hospitals and doctors.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788732354920457832...
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Yes, you are. Had this been Bush here would a dozen post screaming for Impeaching The Liar.

But Obama's on your team. He could murder a dozen hookers and you guys would find a way to blame it on a Republican.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
But Obama's on your team. He could murder a dozen hookers and you guys would find a way to blame it on a Republican.
___________________________

I just wanted to note the obvious cannibalistic nature of that thought clearly establishes racism.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
What he lie about? Who first came up with idea of automatic budget cuts?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
"What he lie about? Who first came up with idea of automatic budget cuts? "

Typical of you. I have come to expect this kind of nonsense from you.

If you don't have a defense, then play ignorant. This is your game.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
When watching porn, how many of you skip the BJ scene?

JediG
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
When watching porn, how many of you skip the BJ scene?

JediG


For many here admitting Obama is a liar is far too hard to swallow.

99
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
best line of the day!
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
"What he lie about? Who first came up with idea of automatic budget cuts? "
---
If you don't have a defense, then play ignorant. This is your game.


Defense? Defense against what?

Not a game. Just trying to figure out what, exactly, you think the lie is about.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
"Not a game. Just trying to figure out what, exactly, you think the lie is about. "

Don't read the article then you can remain clueless.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
"Not a game. Just trying to figure out what, exactly, you think the lie is about. "
---
Don't read the article then you can remain clueless.


I've read the article twice. I'm asking you what you think Obama lied about. Sometimes it helps if you can state in a simple declarative sentence, as in "President Obama lied when he said..."

Can you do that?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Bob Woodward's been banging the tables of various talk shows for weeks, making the same fairly banal point: The White House proposed sequestration as part of a package to raise the debt limit in 2011. Watching Woodward in action has been disconcerting for the many reporters who covered the story in real time. Did the White House float sequestration as a "trigger" to force a better, later deal from Congress? Yes. Would this have ever become an issue if Republicans hadn't chosen to hogtie the debt limit and hold a sixgun to its head for six months? No. So who cares?

Banal, like I said, until Woodward's Friday Washington Post column on the topic. The Post blasted this out to its news alert list with the subject "EXCLUSIVE: Obama Misled; He and Jack Lew Planted Seeds For Disastrous Sequester." That cranked it up from banal to outright strange. First, Woodward's been talking about Obama's slippery denial of ownership of sequestration all year. Second, as Brian Beutler points out, Woodward himself gets the point of sequestration totally wrong. Here's Woodward.

......


http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/02/23/how_bob_woodwar...
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Weigel? Seriously? This is all you got. LOL

http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2013/02/making...
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0



Seriously? This is all you got. LOL

NematodeToSquids


Once again, answer the question, what is the President Lying about?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
I have read most everything Woodward's ever read. Also read the comments about him afterwards ;)

It's much like the aftermath of what he wrote about Bush, while he was talking about Bush and his administration.

Repubpeople hated Woodward after that. Now Democrapeople hate him.

Nobody really cares what the truth is.
Print the post Back To Top