Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif

No. of Recommendations: 0
Zee,

The discrepancy arises from the fact that it's an average of numbers and the averages don't fit the same calculation as each individual component. For example, say your portfolio had stocks with the following prices, intrinsic values and PIV-ER's:
```Price   IV      PIV        ER-----   ---    -------   ------100	100    100.00%	  0.00%90	100	90.00%	 11.10%80	100	80.00%	 25.00%70	100	70.00%	 42.90%60	100	60.00%	 66.70%50	100	50.00%	100.00%                ------  -------Average	(Mean)	75.00%	 40.95%  (add each column and divide by number of stocks)But if you use the formula (1-PIV)/PIV, then (1-.75)/.75 = 33%I'm sure there's some technical mathematical explanation, but this is how it works.  Of course, we should also probably look at the weighted average of our portfolio (larger holdings count for more).Paul (who wondered the same thing when I looked at my own portfolio)

```

### Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.